Removing my last two comments will not improve an understanding of Dr Chu's article,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-chu/dealing-with-nuclear-energy_b_721007.html#comments
nor were my comments offensive. In fact, my comments were lite on opinion, and filled with facts. I even posted a link to testimony of a hearing to Congress about US Interest in central Asia, which discussed our "plans" for Iran.
http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa48119.000/hfa48119_0.htm
You may remove my comments, without any valid reason, claiming they were in violation of your policy? What policy? RThat my comments expose the truth, or do not reflect what you believe is an ok opinion?
Isn't this in fact, EXACTLY how we got into the war with Iraq?This link shows that some mistakenly believe it is republicans who are the driving force for war with Iran
http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/07/29/the_republican_backdoor_to_war_with_iran
And the straw poll in Iowa also selected Pense, who also supports war with Iran. But please, let's discuss why Obama brought dennis Ross into the White House, and why Dr Chu would be repeting false info, not unlike Colin Powel in the Bush run up to war with Iraq.
Even this article shows huge gaps in understanding what is going on with Iran, so when you censor knowedgible comments you enable the continued confusion.
http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/09/16/where_iran_policy_is_heading
Please, please, end you censorship. It does a huge diservice to the people's right to know.
UPDATE! UPDATE!! UPDATE!!
Is OpenAI’s o3 Model AGI?
-
I doubt it’s actually AGI, but it looks impressive. If it’s any
consolation, they let it use a very nontrivial amount of compute to pull
this off. If/when ...